Tax

Samuel S. BLOCH, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

42 F.2d 1013·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1930

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Samuel S. BLOCH, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. No. 2998. Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. July 16, 1930. R. E. Cabell, of Richmond, Va., for petitioner. Randolph C. Shaw, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen. (G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Louis Monarch, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and De Witt M. Evans, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent. Before PARKER, Circuit Judge, and GRONER and ERNEST F. COCHRAN, District Judges. [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Heiner v. Tindle, 276 U. S. 582, 48 S. Ct. 326, 72 L. Ed. 714, and Nichols v. Smith (C. C. A. 1st) 35 F.(2d) 938. Affirmed.