Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Burnham Chemical Co. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd. et al., 1949 — 336 U.S. 924 · caselaw · US
General
Burnham Chemical Co. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd. et al.
336 U.S. 924·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 513.
Burnham Chemical Co. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd. et al.
Thurman Arnold, Sterling Carr and Walton Hamilton for petitioner. Maurice E. Harrison, Moses Lasky and Paul Sandmeyer for Borax Consolidated, Ltd. et al.; and Joseph W. Burns, Michael F. McCarthy and Charles A. Beardsley for American Potash & Chemical Corp., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.