Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
W. M. HOPKINS, Appellant, v. Joseph B. THOMPSON, Superintendent, etc., et al., 1932 — 56 F.2d 1083 · caselaw · US
Tax
W. M. HOPKINS, Appellant, v. Joseph B. THOMPSON, Superintendent, etc., et al.
56 F.2d 1083·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
W. M. HOPKINS, Appellant, v. Joseph B. THOMPSON, Superintendent, etc., et al.
No. 9408.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
March 1, 1932.
Austin L. Wyman, of Chicago, Ill., and Clarence T. Case, David W. Voyles, and George L. Stemmier, all of St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.
James A. Potter, of Jefferson City, Mo., and Harry S. Rooks and William L. Mason, both of St. Louis, Mo., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed, at costs of appellant, but without taxation of attorney fee in favor of appellee.