Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Manhattan Fire Insurance Company of the City of New York et al.. Appellants, v. Joseph Fox et al., Respondents, 1904 — 177 N.Y. 576 · caselaw · US
General
Manhattan Fire Insurance Company of the City of New York et al.. Appellants, v. Joseph Fox et al., Respondents
177 N.Y. 576·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Manhattan Fire Insurance Company of the City of New York et al.. Appellants, v. Joseph Fox et al., Respondents.
Manhattan Fire Ins. Go. v. Fox, 74 App. Div. 271, affirmed.
(Argued January 26, 1904;
decided February 9, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of- the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 23, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
George Edwin Joseph, John A. Nichols and G. I). B. Ilasbrouck for appellants.
Otto Ilorwitz and William II. Blain for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlf/tt, IIaight, Vann, C’Jllen and Werner, JJ.