Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Stuart et al. v. Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, et al., 1960 — 362 U.S. 958 · caselaw · US
General
Stuart et al. v. Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, et al.
362 U.S. 958·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 495.
Stuart et al. v. Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, et al.
James L. McNees, Jr. for appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The motion to recall and amend the judgment is granted. The order of January 11, 1960, 361 U. S. 232, is vacated and the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.