Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William H. Clark, Appellant, v. Charles T. Poor, Impleaded, etc., Respondent, 1895 — 144 N.Y. 699 · caselaw · US
General
William H. Clark, Appellant, v. Charles T. Poor, Impleaded, etc., Respondent
144 N.Y. 699·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William H. Clark, Appellant, v. Charles T. Poor, Impleaded, etc., Respondent.
(Argued January 14, 1895;
decided January 22, 1895.)
This was a motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made December 20, 1893, which dismissed the. complaint and reversed final and interlocutory judgments in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term, and directed judgment in favor of defendant.
Barned, Wa/rren c& Knapp for motion.
Bedfield & Bedfield opposed.
Reported below, 73 Hun, 143.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion. <
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.