Torts · MBE-tested
Francis Conlon, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant
188 N.Y. 619·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Francis Conlon, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant.
(Argued April 25, 1907;
decided May 10, 1907.)
Conlon v. City of New York, 112 App. Div. 912, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the tirst judicial department, entered April 12, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover damages alleged to have been caused to plaintiff’s property through defendant’s negligence in failing to provide a proper outlet for a sewer.
William B. Ellison, Corporation^ Covmsel (Theodore Connoly and Royal E. T. Riggs of counsel), for appellant.
Charles Maitland Beattie and Joseph P. Hennessy for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ. Not voting: Haight, J.