Contracts · MBE-tested
Bowles, for and in behalf of the United States, et al. v. Wilke et al.
338 U.S. 861·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Minton took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 299.
Bowles, for and in behalf of the United States, et al. v. Wilke et al.
Solicitor General Perlman for petitioners. Cushman B. Bissell for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Minton took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.