General
George E. Hyatt, as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. William W. Dusenbury et al., Appellants
106 N.Y. 663·New York Court of Appeals·1887·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George E. Hyatt, as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. William W. Dusenbury et al., Appellants.
This was a motion to dismiss appeal from judgment. It was granted on the ground that the defendants, who appealed, had no interest in the matter in controversy, and so were not aggrieved and could not appeal. (Code Civ. Pro., § 1294.)
(Argued June 14, 1887;
decided June 28, 1887.)
A. Walker Ot/is for motion.
Moody B. Smith opposed.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam]
Per Curiam
mem. for granting motion to dismiss appeal.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.