Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Owensboro Water Works Company of Owensboro, Ky., Appellant, v. City of Owensboro, Ky., 1904 — 193 U.S. 667 · caselaw · US
General
Owensboro Water Works Company of Owensboro, Ky., Appellant, v. City of Owensboro, Ky.
193 U.S. 667·Supreme Court of the United States·1904
Mr. William. 7\ Ellis and Mr. J. D. Atchison for appellant. Mr. Reuben A. Miller, Mr. Geo. W. Jolly, Mr. Charles S. Walker and Mr. Robert S. Todd for appellee. 1 •
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 512.
Owensboro Water Works Company of Owensboro, Ky., Appellant, v. City of Owensboro, Ky.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Kentucky.
Submitted February 29, 1904.
Decided March 7, 1904.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Decree affirmed with costs, on the authority of City of Joplin v. Southwest Missouri Light Company, 191 U. S. 150.
Mr. William. 7\ Ellis and Mr. J. D. Atchison for appellant. Mr. Reuben A. Miller, Mr. Geo. W. Jolly, Mr. Charles S. Walker and Mr. Robert S. Todd for appellee. 1 •