General
Connecticut National Bank, Respondent, v. John R. Bayles, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
163 N.Y. 561·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Connecticut National Bank, Respondent, v. John R. Bayles, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Connecticut Nat. Bank v. Bayles, 17 App. Div. 596, reversed.
(Argued February 13, 1900;
decided May 15, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May' 24, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury.
A. A. Spear for appellant.
Thomas J. Hitch, Jr., and Jacob Hosen for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
■ Judgment reversed and complaint dismissed, without costs to either party, on the opinion of Werner, J., in Aultmcm da Taylor Co. v. Syme (163 N. Y. 54).
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.