Contracts · MBE-tested
Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime Commission et al.
392 U.S. 901·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
June 10, 1968.
No. 69.
Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime Commission et al.,
Cecelia H. Goetz and Richard Whiting on the motion. Solicitor General Griswold and Robert N. Katz for the Federal Maritime Commission et al., R. Frederic Fisher for Pacific Maritime Assn., and William W. Schwarzer for Marine Terminals Corp., in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
390 U. S. 261. Upon consideration of motion of petitioner to amend judgment and retax costs, the judgment heretofore issued in this case on April 1, 1968, is amended to tax one-half of the costs in favor of petitioner and against respondents Pacific Maritime Assn, and Marine Terminals Corp.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.