Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Marshall, Superintendent, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility v. Fowler et al., 1983 — 460 U.S. 1098 · caselaw · US
General
Marshall, Superintendent, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility v. Fowler et al.
460 U.S. 1098·Supreme Court of the United States·1983
For The Chief Justice’s views concerning this case, see Spalding v. Aiken, ante, p. 1093.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 82-876.
Marshall, Superintendent, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility v. Fowler et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.
For The Chief Justice’s views concerning this case, see Spalding v. Aiken, ante, p. 1093.