Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Funicello v. New Jersey; Childs v. North Carolina, 1971 — 403 U.S. 948 · caselaw · US
General
Funicello v. New Jersey; Childs v. North Carolina
403 U.S. 948·Supreme Court of the United States·1971
Mr. Justice Black dissents.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 5011.
No. 5014.
Funicello v. New Jersey. Childs v. North Carolina.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Ct. N. J. Reported below: 52 N. J. 263, 245 A. 2d 181; and
Super. Ct. N. C., Buncombe County. Reported below: See 269 N. C. 307, 152 S. E. 2d 453. Motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgments, insofar as they impose the death sentence, reversed and cases remanded for further proceedings. Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510 (1968); Boulden vHolman, 394 U. S. 478 (1969) ; Maxwell v. Bishop, 398 U. S. 262 (1970); and United States v. Jackson, 390 U. S. 570 (1968).
Mr. Justice Black dissents.