General
Joseph L. Rusling, Respondent, v. Union Pipe and Construction Company, Appellant
158 N.Y. 737·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur, except O’Brien and Vann, JJ., not voting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph L. Rusling, Respondent, v. Union Pipe and Construction Company, Appellant.
(Submitted March 21, 1899;
decided April 18, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 3, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
Rusling v. Union Pipe & Construction Co., 5 App. Div. 448, affirmed.
Frederick G. Dow for appellant.
Merritt E. Ma/oiland for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except O’Brien and Vann, JJ., not voting.