General
Annie Wright Seminary, Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Tacoma
187 U.S. 639·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 162.
Annie Wright Seminary, Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Tacoma.
In error to the Supreme Court of. the State of Washington.
Submitted December 22, 1902.
Decided January 12, 1903.
See case below, 23 Washington, 109.
Mr. John F. Shafroth for the plaintiff in error. Mr. David A. Gourick for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam,]
Per Curiam,
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of Gillis v. Stinchfield, 159 U. S. 658; Pittsburgh Company v. Cleveland Company, 178 U. S. 279; Speed v. McCarthy, 181 U. S. 269, 275.