Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. RUBY CONCRETE COMPANY, Respondent, 1975 — 519 F.2d 1375 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. RUBY CONCRETE COMPANY, Respondent
519 F.2d 1375·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. RUBY CONCRETE COMPANY, Respondent.
No. 75-1076.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 12, 1975.
Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Emil C. Farkas, Director, Region 9, N.L.R.B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner.
Joseph A. Yocum, Kahn, Dees, Donovan & Kahn, Evansville, Ind., for respondent.
Before CELEBREZZE, McCREE and LIVELY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY]
ORDER
This case is before the court upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order. The decision and order of the Board are reported at 213 NLRB No. 103. Upon due consideration this court holds that the findings of fact of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. The court further concludes that it was within the discretion of the Board to order the respondent to bargain with the union under the facts of this case. National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., 395 U.S. 575, 89 S.Ct. 1918, 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969).
The order of the Board is enforced.