Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chamberlain Medicine Company, Appellant, v. The Elk Drug Company, Respondent, 1908 — 191 N.Y. 539 · caselaw · US
General
Chamberlain Medicine Company, Appellant, v. The Elk Drug Company, Respondent
191 N.Y. 539·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Chamberlain Medicine Company, Appellant, v. The Elk Drug Company, Respondent.
Qliamberlnin Medicine Go. v. Elk Drug Go., 114 App. Div. 355, affirmed
(Argued February 27, 1908;
decided March 13, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered June 29, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover a sum alleged to be due for goods sold and delivered.
Thomas B. Merchant and L. M. Merchant for appellant.
Archibald Howard for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Yann, Werner, Hisoock and Chase, JJ.