Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The National Savings Bank of the City of Albany, Respondent, v. William S. Slade, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1897 — 153 N.Y. 668 · caselaw · US
General
The National Savings Bank of the City of Albany, Respondent, v. William S. Slade, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
153 N.Y. 668·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The National Savings Bank of the City of Albany, Respondent, v. William S. Slade, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
National Savings Bank v. Slade, 17 App. Div. 115, appeal dismissed.
(Argued June 7, 1897 ;
decided June 15, 1897.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered April 21, 1897, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the decision of the Appellate Division was unanimous; that the record presents no question of law that can be reviewed by the Court of Appeals; that the appeal is without merit and frivolous, and that the appellant has failed to give a proper undertaking.
Posendale de Ilessberg for motion.
Ndrmmd P. Oottle opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.