Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Halvor Marcus DALEY, Appellee, 1935 — 75 F.2d 1020 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Halvor Marcus DALEY, Appellee
75 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1935
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Halvor Marcus DALEY, Appellee.
No. 7787.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 4, 1935.
James H. Baldwin, U. S. Atty., of Butte, Mont., for the United States.
Molumby, Busha & Greenan, of Great Falls, Mont., for appellee.
Before WILBUR, Circuit Judge, and ST. SURE, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal dismissed; mandate forthwith.