Contracts · MBE-tested

CONNER v. CITY OF HAMMOND

389 U.S. 4819 L. Ed. 2d 47·Supreme Court of the United States·1967

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

CONNER v. CITY OF HAMMOND. No. 259. Decided October 23, 1967. Leonard B. Levy and Stanley Fleishman for petitioner. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam. Mr. Justice Harlan] Per Curiam. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Twenty-first Judicial District Court for the Parish of Tangipahoa, Louisiana, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767. Mr. Justice Harlan would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.