Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen et al. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al., 1969 — 393 U.S. 1050 · caselaw · US
General
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen et al. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al.
393 U.S. 1050·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 774.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen et al. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al.
Alex Elson, Willard J. Lassers, Aaron S. Wolff, Herbert L. Segal, Harold C. Heiss, Russell Day, and Robert E. Hogan for petitioners.
John P. Sandidge, Joseph L. Len-ihan, Marvin D. Jones, and David M. Yearwood for Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., and Harold A. Ross and Charles I. Dawson for Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.