Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Shibley v. United States, 1956 — 352 U.S. 873 · caselaw · US
General
Shibley v. United States
352 U.S. 873·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 243.
Shibley v. United States.
Morris Lavine, Daniel G. Marshall, A. L. Wirin and Sam Rosenwein for petitioner. Oscar H. Davis, then Acting Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrovsky for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir.
The motion for leave to file brief of William R. Enright et al., as amici curiae, is denied. Certiorari denied.