Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Smith v. Mississippi; Harris v. Pulley, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin; Morris v. Tennessee, 1983 — 460 U.S. 1047 · caselaw · US
Constitutional Law · MBE-tested
Smith v. Mississippi; Harris v. Pulley, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin; Morris v. Tennessee
460 U.S. 1047·Supreme Court of the United States·1983
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 82-5922.
No. 82-6019.
No. 82-6089.
Smith v. Mississippi. Harris v. Pulley, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin. Morris v. Tennessee.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Ct. Miss.; C. A. 9th Cir.; and Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 82-5922, 419 So. 2d 563; No. 82-6019, 692 F. 2d 1189; No. 82-6089, 641 S. W. 2d 883.
[DISSENT — Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,]
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.