Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mosley v. Cia Mar Adra, S. A., et al., 1963 — 375 U.S. 835 · caselaw · US
General
Mosley v. Cia Mar Adra, S. A., et al.
375 U.S. 835·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 170.
Mosley v. Cia Mar Adra, S. A., et al.
Edward J. Behrens, Charles H. Lawson and Charles A. Ellis for petitioner. Victor S. Cichanowicz for Cia Mar Adra, S. A., and Edmund F. Lamb for Lipsett Steel Products, Inc., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.