Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sawyer, Secretary of Commerce, et al. v. Dollar et al.; and In re Killion, 1951 — 342 U.S. 875 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Sawyer, Secretary of Commerce, et al. v. Dollar et al.; and In re Killion
342 U.S. 875·Supreme Court of the United States·1951
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 247.
No. 248.
Sawyer, Secretary of Commerce, et al. v. Dollar et al.; and In re Killion.
Attorney General McGrath and Solicitor General Perlman for petitioners in No. 247..
Arthur B. Dunne for petitioner in No. 248. Herman Phleger, Gregory A. Harrison, Moses Lasky, Edmund L. Jones and Howard Boyd for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.