Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles T. Blansett, Appellant, v. Walter B. Duffy, Respondent, 1907 — 189 N.Y. 572 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Charles T. Blansett, Appellant, v. Walter B. Duffy, Respondent
189 N.Y. 572·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles T. Blansett, Appellant, v. Walter B. Duffy, Respondent.
Blansett v. Duffy, 111 App. Div. 908, affirmed.
(Argued October 16, 1907;
decided November 1, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 16, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a, dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.
Thomas Hogan for appellant.
Erwin E. Skutt and George D. Peed for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ, Not sitting: Hisqook, J,