Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Margaret Robinson, Respondent, v. Supreme Commandery, United Order of the Golden Cross of the World, Appellant, 1904 — 177 N.Y. 564 · caselaw · US
General
Margaret Robinson, Respondent, v. Supreme Commandery, United Order of the Golden Cross of the World, Appellant
177 N.Y. 564·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Margaret Robinson, Respondent, v. Supreme Commandery, United Order of the Golden Cross of the World, Appellant.
Bobinson v. Supreme Gommamlery, 77 App. Div. 315, affirmed.
(Submitted January 8, 1904;
decided January 26, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 16, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Alfred B. Cruikshanlc, Ilenry G. Atwater and J. O. Thomson for appellant.
Gharles Blcmdy and JEdmttnd L. Mooney for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, .Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.