Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Philip B. Thompson, Jr., Respondent, v. The Knickerbocker Ice Company, Appellant, 1891 — 127 N.Y. 671 · caselaw · US
General
Philip B. Thompson, Jr., Respondent, v. The Knickerbocker Ice Company, Appellant
127 N.Y. 671·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Philip B. Thompson, Jr., Respondent, v. The Knickerbocker Ice Company, Appellant.
(Argued April 28, 1891;
decided June 2, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment óf the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of EewYork, entered upon an order made June 4, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an ■order denying a motion for a new trial.
Albert Stiolmey for appellant.
John J. Admns for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.