Contracts · MBE-tested

Utah v. United States

390 U.S. 977·Supreme Court of the United States·1968

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

March 11, 1968. No. 31, Orig. Utah v. United States. George E. Boss and Robert D. Larsen on the motions. Phil L. Hansen, Attorney General, for the State of Utah in opposition; Solicitor General Griswold for the United States. [MAJORITY] Motions of Great Salt Lake Minerals & Chemicals Corp. for leave to intervene as a plaintiff and to intervene, in the alternative, as a defendant, together with its answer and cross claim referred to Special Master for a report and recommendation. Such report and recommendation shall also include motion of Morton International, Inc., for leave to intervene heretofore referred to the Special Master. [For earlier orders herein, see, e. g., 389 U. S. 909.] Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.