Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nicolas Chapuis, Appellant, v. May A. Mathot, Impleaded, etc., Respondent, 1898 — 155 N.Y. 641 · caselaw · US
General
Nicolas Chapuis, Appellant, v. May A. Mathot, Impleaded, etc., Respondent
155 N.Y. 641·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nicolas Chapuis, Appellant, v. May A. Mathot, Impleaded, etc., Respondent.
Ohapuis y. Mathot, 91 Hun, 565, affirmed.
(Argued January 26, 1898;
decided March 1, 1898.)
Appeal from a final judgment of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 21,1896, upon an order affirming an interlocutory judgment in favor of defendant entered upon an order of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
Arthur Furber for appellant.
William L. Mathot for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except Parker, Cli. J., not sitting.