Contracts · MBE-tested
OVERTON v. NEW YORK
393 U.S. 85·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Black dissents and would affirm the judgment of conviction here.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
OVERTON v. NEW YORK.
No. 212.
Decided October 28, 1968.
Melvin L. Wulf and David C. Gilberg for petitioner.
Carl A. Vergari and James J. Duggan for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in the light of Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U. S. 543 (1968).
Mr. Justice Black dissents and would affirm the judgment of conviction here.