Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; Streeter et al. v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; Home Insurance Co. et al. v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; and Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al. v. Securities & Exchange Commission et al., 1948 — 335 U.S. 851 · caselaw · US
Securities
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; Streeter et al. v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; Home Insurance Co. et al. v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; and Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al. v. Securities & Exchange Commission et al.
335 U.S. 851·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 226.
No. 227.
No. 243.
No. 266.
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; Streeter et al. v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; Home Insurance Co. et al. v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; and Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al. v. Securities & Exchange Commission et al.
Solicitor General Perlman and Roger S. Foster for the Securities & Exchange Commission, petitioner in No. 226 and respondent in No. 266. Lawrence R. Condon and Milton Maurer for Streeter et al., petitioners in No. 227 and respondents in No. 266. Francis H. Scheetz for petitioners in No. 243.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.
Alfred Berman, Philip W. Amran and Abraham Shamos for the Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al., petitioners in No. 266 and respondents in Nos. 226, 227 and 243.
Louis Boehm for White et al., respondents in Nos. 226, 227 and 243.
W. E. Tucker and Paul D. Miller for the Engineers Public Service Co., respondent in Nos. 226 and 227.
Louis Boehm filed a brief for White et al., as amici curiae, supporting petitioners in No. 266.
Reported below: 168 F. 2d 722.