Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Consolidated Freightways, Inc. v. United States, 1943 — 320 U.S. 781 · caselaw · US
General
Consolidated Freightways, Inc. v. United States
320 U.S. 781·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 352.
Consolidated Freightways, Inc. v. United States.
November 8, 1943.
Messrs. Francis R. Kirkham and Donald A, Schafer for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Chester T. Lane, Robert L. Pierce, Edward Dumbauld, and George H. English for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certi-orari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.