Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jeannie Z. Leggat, Respondent, v. Marietta Leggat, as Executrix of Richard J. Leggat, Deceased, Appellant, 1903 — 176 N.Y. 590 · caselaw · US
General
Jeannie Z. Leggat, Respondent, v. Marietta Leggat, as Executrix of Richard J. Leggat, Deceased, Appellant
176 N.Y. 590·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jeannie Z. Leggat, Respondent, v. Marietta Leggat, as Executrix of Richard J. Leggat, Deceased, Appellant.
Leggat v. Leggat, 79 App. Div. 141, affirmed.
(Argued October 27, 1903;
decided November 10, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment, entered February 11, 1903, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, overruling defendant’s exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division and denying a motion for a new trial.
William A. Keener and A. Delos Kneelancl for appellant.
Joseph A. Burr and Michael Furst for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ.