General
Cora L. Hosford, as Administratrix of Fred L. Hosford, Deceased, Respondent, v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
161 N.Y. 660·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Cora L. Hosford, as Administratrix of Fred L. Hosford, Deceased, Respondent, v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
Hosford v. JV. T. G. <6 H. B. B. B. Go., 39 App. Div. 327, affirmed.
(Argued January 23, 1900;
decided February 13, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate .Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 23, 1899, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint at a Trial Term, and an order denying a motion for a new trial, and granting a new trial.
Albert H. Harris for appellant.
Thomas Paines and Charles F. Miller for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. „ Not sitting: Gray, J.