Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brevoort Real Estate Company, Plaintiff, v. John Kingston et al., Defendants. Henry Nobel et al., Appellants; Joseph H. Claffy, Respondent, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 584 · caselaw · US
General
Brevoort Real Estate Company, Plaintiff, v. John Kingston et al., Defendants. Henry Nobel et al., Appellants; Joseph H. Claffy, Respondent
186 N.Y. 584·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Brevoort Real Estate Company, Plaintiff, v. John Kingston et al., Defendants. Henry Nobel et al., Appellants; Joseph H. Claffy, Respondent.
Brevoort Real Estate Co. v. Kingston, 114 App. Div. 904, affirmed.
(Argued November 12, 1906;
decided November 27, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 20, 1906, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee in surplus money proceedings.
Charles II. Stoddard for appellants.
Frank, M. Avery and Henry W. Eaton for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscpok, JJ".