Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Estate of Herbert et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1944 — 322 U.S. 752 · caselaw · US
Tax
Estate of Herbert et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
322 U.S. 752·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 937.
Estate of Herbert et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
May 29, 1944.
Mr. Baymond F. Garrity for petitioners.
Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Samuel 0. Clark, Jr., Mr. Sewall Key, and Misses Helen B. Carloss and Melva M. Graney for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.