Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
National Bus Traffic Association, Inc., et al. v. United States et al., 1957 — 352 U.S. 1020 · caselaw · US
General
National Bus Traffic Association, Inc., et al. v. United States et al.
352 U.S. 1020·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 661.
National Bus Traffic Association, Inc., et al. v. United States et al.
James F. X. O’Brien, Jack R. Turney, Jr. and Eugene T. Liipjert for appellants. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Daniel M. Friedman, Henry Newton Williams, Robert W. Gin-nane and Isaac K. Hay for the. United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Harry A. Bowen and Jerrold Scoutt, Jr. for the American Society of Travel Agents, Inc., Robert S. Buttles for Tauck Tours, Inc., and S. Harrison Kahn for Thos. Cook & Son, Inc., et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.