Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
FARINA BUS LINE & TRANSPORTATION CO., Appellant, v. CITY OF HAMMOND, Appellee, 1926 — 11 F.2d 943 · caselaw · US
General
FARINA BUS LINE & TRANSPORTATION CO., Appellant, v. CITY OF HAMMOND, Appellee
11 F.2d 943·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FARINA BUS LINE & TRANSPORTATION CO., Appellant, v. CITY OF HAMMOND, Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
March 12, 1926.)
No. 8637.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Indiana.
F. C. Crumpaeker, of Hammond, Ind., for appellant.
L. L. Bomberger, of Hammond, Ind., for appellee.
Before EVANS, PAGE, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PAGE, Circuit Judge.]
PAGE, Circuit Judge.
In so far as here material, the facts in this case are the same as in No. 3668, Schappi Bus Line v. City of Hammond, 11 F.(2d) 940, decided this date, and the discussion there applies equally to this case.
The decree is reversed, with directions to the District Court to enter a decree granting the injunction.