Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The United Press, Respondent, v. The A. S. Abell Company et al., Defendants, and Felix Agnus, Appellant, 1904 — 178 N.Y. 578 · caselaw · US
General
The United Press, Respondent, v. The A. S. Abell Company et al., Defendants, and Felix Agnus, Appellant
178 N.Y. 578·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The United Press, Respondent, v. The A. S. Abell Company et al., Defendants, and Felix Agnus, Appellant.
United Press v. Abell Go., 79 App. Div. 550, affirmed.
(Argued March 15, 1904;
decided March 29, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 16, 1903, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirming an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Austen G. Fox and Henry T. Fay. for appellant.
William C. Paris for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Not voting: O’Brien, J.