Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LADNER v. UNITED STATES, 1958 — 355 U.S. 282 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
LADNER v. UNITED STATES
355 U.S. 2822 L. Ed. 2d 270·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LADNER v. UNITED STATES.
No. 41.
Argued November 19, 1957.
Decided January 6, 1958.
Harold Rosenwald, acting under appointment by the Court, 352 U. S. 959, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Leonard B. Sand argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Warren Olney, III, .then Assistant Attorney General, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.