General
Bella C. Vassileades et al., Respondents, v. Steeplechase Company, Appellant
183 N.Y. 564·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bella C. Vassileades et al., Respondents, v. Steeplechase Company, Appellant.
(Submitted January 8, 1906;
decided January 16, 1906.)
Reported below, 108 App. Div. 356.
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate División of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 23, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the Appellate Division unanimously decided that the verdict was supported by the evidence, and that the exceptions were frivolous.
Robert B. Knowles for motion.
Henry E. Heistad opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.