General
I. AROTSKY, RESPONDENT, v. I. KROPNITSKY, APPELLANT
101 N.J.L. 203·New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals·1925·NJ
Brief incoming
Source-anchored Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
I. AROTSKY, RESPONDENT, v. I. KROPNITSKY, APPELLANT.
Submitted November 7, 1924
Decided January 19, 1925.
On appeal from the'Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 98 N. J. L. 344.
Eor the respondent, Cohen & Klein.
Eor the appellant, Arthur B. Seymour.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teen-chard, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.