Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Gray, Attorney General of Virginia, et al., 1962 — 371 U.S. 884 · caselaw · US
General
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Gray, Attorney General of Virginia, et al.
371 U.S. 884·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 5.
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Gray, Attorney General of Virginia, et al.
Robert L. Carter on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 365 U. S. 842, to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Argued November 8, 1961. Restored to the calendar for reargument, 369 U. S. 833. The motion to substitute Robert Y. Button et al. in the place of Frederick T. Gray et al. as parties respondent is granted.