General
Samuel Weeks et al., Appellants, v. Jacob W. Cornell et al., Respondents
98 N.Y. 657·New York Court of Appeals·1885·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel Weeks et al., Appellants, v. Jacob W. Cornell et al., Respondents.
(Argued March 3, 1885;
decided March 10, 1885.)
This was a motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of General Term, modifying, and affirming as modified, an interlocutory judgment.
Held, not appealable. (Raynor v. Raynor, 94 N. T. 248.)
Flamen B. Candler, Abner C. Thomas, Charles H. Osbander, A. H. Btoiber and Bartow 8. Weeks for motion.
8. H. Thayer opposed.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam]
Per Curiam
mem. for granting motion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.