Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles Harriman et al., Appellants, v. The City of Yonkers, Respondent, 1906 — 184 N.Y. 572 · caselaw · US
General
Charles Harriman et al., Appellants, v. The City of Yonkers, Respondent
184 N.Y. 572·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Harriman et al., Appellants, v. The City of Yonkers, Respondent.
Harriman v. City of Yonkers, 109 App. Div. 246, appeal dismissed.
(Argued February 28, 1906;
decided March 20, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 17, 1905, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion to amend and modify an order entered upon the remittitur of the Court of Appeals and granted said motion.
James M. Hunt for appellants.
Thomas F. Curran for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Werner and Hisoook, JJ. Cullen, Ch. J., votes for affirmance. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, J.