Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
First National Bank in Indiana, Pennsylvania, v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association; and Parnell v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, 1957 — 353 U.S. 973 · caselaw · US
General
First National Bank in Indiana, Pennsylvania, v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association; and Parnell v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association
353 U.S. 973·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 888.
No. 975.
First National Bank in Indiana, Pennsylvania, v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association; and Parnell v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association.
Harvey A. Miller, Jr., Harvey A. Miller, J. Lee Miller and Horace Stern for petitioner in No. 888. Edward Dumbauld for petitioner in No. 975. Robert L. Kirkpatrick, John G. Buchanan and Erwin N. Gris-wold for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Reported below: 241 F. 2d 455.