Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Goins v. United States, 1939 — 306 U.S. 622 · caselaw · US
General
Goins v. United States
306 U.S. 622·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 516.
Goins v. United States.
Argued March 9, 10, 1939.
Decided April 17, 1939.
Mr. S. H. Sutherland for petitioner.
Mr. William W. Barron, with whom Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Attorney General McMahon, and Messrs. George F. Kneip, Fred E. Strine, and W. Marvin Smith were on the brief, for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
As it appears on hearing argument-that the District Court’s failure to give Instruction B could not have prejudiced the petitioner; the writ of certiorari is dismissed.