Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ostrofsky et al. v. United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, et al., 1960 — 363 U.S. 849 · caselaw · US
General
Ostrofsky et al. v. United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, et al.
363 U.S. 849·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 896,
Misc.
Ostrofsky et al. v. United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, et al.
Bernard W. Rubenstein for petitioners. Arthur J. Goldberg and David E. Feller for the United Steelworkers of America, and John H. Morse, Ralph L. McAfee and H. Vernon Eney for Bethlehem Steel Co., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.